The decision was endorsed by the National Security Committee - the country’s principal decision-making forum on foreign policy and national security - a day later amid opposition by rights organisations and activists. The military had termed the events of May 9 a “ dark chapter” and announced around a week after the incidents its plan to try the rioters under relevant laws, including two military laws - the Pakistan Army Act and Official Secrets Act. While the protests were underway, social media was flooded with footage of rioting and vandalism at various spots, including the Jinnah House and General Headquarters, the army’s head of office in Rawalpindi. On May 9, countrywide protests erupted after the paramilitary Rangers whisked away PTI Chairman Imran Khan from the Islamabad High Court in a corruption case. We have to get access to some social media pages during the custody of the former premier.” Special Prosecutor Farhad Ali Shah also addressed the media, explaining, “The police conducted a thorough investigation from all aspects. “We need custody of the PTI chief,” Shah added. Later, when speaking to the media outside the court, Shah stated: “The chairman of PTI has been found guilty,” emphasising that the police had completed their probe. Judge Abher Gul Khan presided over today’s hearing, with both Special Prosecutor Farhad Ali Shah and Imran’s counsel Barrister Salman Safdar present before the judge.Īt the outset, Shah informed the court that the police had concluded their investigation, and their findings indicated the PTI chairman’s guilt on the charges.Īfter the prosecutor’s statement, the court summoned lawyers from both sides to present their arguments during the next hearing, scheduled for August 8. The cases in question concern the attacks on Jinnah House, Askari Tower, the Shadman Town police station, vandalism at the PML-N office in Model Town, and the setting ablaze of a container when protests erupted in the country following Imran’s arrest in the Toshakhana case. In the last hearing, the court had directed the former premier to become a part of investigation and extended his bails until June 21 (today). The legality of listening to a particular transmission will depend on more information than you've provided.An anti-terrorism court in Lahore on Friday extended the bails of PTI Chairman Imran Khan in five cases registered in connection with violence in the country on May 9, as the prosecutor informed the court that the police have found the ex-PM “guilty” during their investigation. However, Supreme Court rulings, FCC rules, federal laws, and local laws are open to some interpretation. Local laws often make it illegal to listen to law enforcement transmissions in connection with a crime. There are additional restrictions on decoding digital transmissions, which may make it illegal with today's systems. This makes it difficult to listen to them, or profit from listening, but doesn't necessarily make it directly illegal to listen to them. Also there are specific harsh penalties for divulging information you may learn from cellular transmissions. However, if you sell scanners you must restrict them from receiving in the cellular bands, for instance. These live audio feeds are also good for student pilots: get used to standard phraseology of ground control, tower, etc., at various speeds. While it's generally believed that listening to cellphone conversations is illegal, that is not generally true, and is not federally mandated. You can listen to live air traffic control (ATC) radio communication of many airports around the world, via the internet. Alternately, there are restrictions on trying to obtain for-pay services without paying for them in certain circumstances, such as pay-tv, hold music services, and so forth even if they do not encrypt their transmissions. Most of the time the restrictions only come into play when you divulge information you gained from listening to certain transmissions.īut there are also restrictions that disallow intercepting transmissions for one's personal gain, such as operating a taxi service, listening to the competitor's dispatcher, and acting on that information to gain a business advantage. In the US the answer is generally yes, you can listen to such transmissions, but local and federal laws may have some restrictions on what you can do with information gained from listening activities, and in some very specific circumstances you aren't allowed to listen at all.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |